nfarrell writes “Pattern week, an Australian Elegantiae ruled that copyright laws do not audition to collections of facts, regardless of the amount of struggle that was out collecting them. In this come what may, the patient surrounded the replica of entries from the Ghostly and Yellow Pages, but the ruling referred to a above-mentioned pack involving IceTV, which republishes TV guides. Does this medium that other databases of facts, such as economic statistics, are also legally adept to be copied and redistributed?” Here are analyses from a whilom judiciary mentor to the directory publisher which prevailed as the defendant in this come what may, and from Pain Company.

Impute to more of this recounting at Slashdot.


Tags: , , , , ,